[eDebate] Accusations of Illegal Debating

[Andy Ellis]

its likely that you and i will disagree bout the need of race talk
within  institutions but your lible claims only give me access to my
genocidl propaganda and education claims

On 11/3/07, road runner <db8coach at bak.rr.com> wrote:

> >>>>>>>>>>

>  This doesnt of course mean i am making a debate is inherently racist

> argument or something, but the question is how do you address these concerns

> when they come up? How do you deal with differing degrees of perceived

> racism?

> >>>>>>>>>>

>

> You deal with them outside the debate room. If you feel that a team is using

> racist language or sexist language, and you feel that it creates a hostile

> environment, then take it outside the debate room. Take it to the proper

> authorities. We have rules and laws against it. And we have methods of

> redress.

>

> >>>>>>>>>>

> Marlow  thinks the new law in oklahoma is racist, if you disagree does that

> mean he is irresponsible for making that charge?

> >>>>>>>>>>

>

> Personally, yeah. But if he were to run around telling people that the

> writer of the law is a racist for writing it, then he should be held

> accountable for his claim. He may also be guilty of libel. And THAT is what

> happens in many rounds. Often the argument goes from "the govenment is

> racist/sexist" to "YOU are a racist/sexist for arguing in favor of the

> government". And yes, I think this crosses a line that ought not be crossed.

>

> Bob

>