[eDebate] topicality is a penalty and an appopriate one

[Andy Ellis]

I agree with the sentiment expressed here, but this line sums up my argument
pretty well, while not trying to.


If topicality was not a penalty for the Aff, only complete idiots would be

> topical.



And so it is..the problem of course here is this is largely true and a
description of the status quo....but i think there is a benefit to those who
choose to be topical outside of the ability to win and i think thats  a
benefit that comes from playing within a set of rules despite the fact that
they are becoming increasingly voluntary (at least in front of approximatly
a quarter of the judges). This applies to the non topical folks as well, i
just think hey define the benfits they get from the shared set of rules and
a playing field with a bit more liberalism...


Gregg Hartney

> Jenks HS, Oklahoma

>

> _______________________________________________

> eDebate mailing list

> eDebate at www.ndtceda.com

> http://www.ndtceda.com/mailman/listinfo/edebate

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ndtceda.com/pipermail/edebate/attachments/20070605/57f037e7/attachment.htm