[eDebate] cutter for hire

[Brent Culpepper]

Seriously....its a big topic you need research....

debate = research focus or at least used too

On 7/25/07, NEIL BERCH <berchnorto at msn.com> wrote:

>

>  Donald--I'm not sure I buy that, but:

> 1.  I'm not intending to get into a full-fledged debate on this.  For many

> reasons, I'm comfortable with my position on this.  I just wanted to provoke

> some thought and consideration.

> 2.  Let me be clear that I'm not begrudging you the niche that you have

> found in the market.  My question is probably more for those who might hire

> you than it is for you.

> Best wishes,

> Neil

>

>

> ----- Original Message -----

> *From:* Donald Bryson <anabaptist at alltel.net>

> *To:* edebate at www.ndtceda.com

> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 25, 2007 4:27 PM

> *Subject:* [eDebate] cutter for hire

>

> You could say a couple of things:

>

> 1) Due to the simple nature of the competition that is debate, it is

> necessary (depending on your teams' style) to have an abundance of

> evidence.  Hiring me wouldn't be any different that hiring a quarterback

> coach for the football team (you have a good qb coach, by the way) except

> that what I provide is more academically inclined.

>

> 2) The cards that I cut would be cards that you or your students wouldn't

> be cutting, therefore exposing the entire team to more literature on the

> topic.

>

> But that's just me.

> _______________________________________________

> eDebate mailing list

> eDebate at www.ndtceda.com

> http://www.ndtceda.com/mailman/listinfo/edebate

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> eDebate mailing list

> eDebate at www.ndtceda.com

> http://www.ndtceda.com/mailman/listinfo/edebate

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ndtceda.com/pipermail/edebate/attachments/20070727/abf77970/attachment.htm