[eDebate] Hanson/Mahoney Proposal
Stefan Bauschard
SBauschard at planetdebate.com
Wed Jul 18 20:44:37 CDT 2007
I believe that when the NDT decided to debate the CEDA topic they passed a rule that said that they'd debate the CEDA topic IF CEDA chose a policy topic. Otherwise, they would write their own policy topic.
Is my recollection correct? Is this rule still in existence?
If I am right, allowing non-policy topics on the ballot through a more free-wheeled resolution writing process could allow the selection of a non-policy topic by CEDA (at least based on Jim's description of his proposal).
If this happened, one of two things would then have to happen:
a) The NDT would have to decide to not enforce this seemingly significant rule or
b) The NDT would have to write another policy topic, creating a split (and a mess, since it would be done on the fly).
My point is not to defend the policy-only topic rule or engage the discussion on a split/merger. My point is that this matter needs to be given some consideration and perhaps some substantial consultation should occor between the respective bodies.
More information about the eDebate
mailing list