[eDebate] Pre-Shirley Disclosure

lacyjp lacyjp at wfu.edu
Thu Nov 2 18:40:57 EST 2006



BTW -- I'lll be on the road at the JMU tournament this weekend.

If you send me stuff & I don't get back to you promptly, its not because
I hate you.

-- JP Lacy
lacyjp at wfu.edu



On 11/2/2006 12:16 AM, Jean-Paul Lacy wrote:


>

> The Shirley is right around the corner. After watching the inspirational

> performance of “Scout: Adam ‘Ace’ Garen” on CSTV, we're looking forward

> to scouting our tournament as well as we possibly can.

>

> “We all want better debates.” Better information improves debate for

> everyone. This year, its particularly true--We're all still learning

> from each other how to research and debate a legal topic. The list is a

> community project: It takes a big effort on the part of all participants

> in the tournament to make it what it is.

>

> This year, we’re experimenting with major change to the basic model:

> Previously, we’ve withheld the list & released it only

> to contributors.

> This year, we’re decentralizing the process: Information

> is going up on a wiki as soon as we can post it. Anyone can view the

> information once its posted. [The wiki will be up and running “when its

> done.” I’ll post the URL to eDebate then.]

> Pre-tournament disclosure is still a condition of entry,

> but this inverts the “free-riding problem.” Everyone can see who isn’t

> participating. Anyone who wants to correct free-riding can edit the list

> by emailing me for permission and adding the information they have. [You

> can still just email it to me] (We’ll change this basic protocol as

> necessary…but we need some way to maintain a certain level of

> accountability.)

> You’ll be able to download the whole wiki so you can

> read it offline. It won’t be printable, but it will be in the form of a

> bunch of smaller files instead of a giant document that crashes your

> computer.

> If the experiment backfires, we can always revert to the

> old model by making the wiki viewable only by approved members.

>

> To facilitate scouting during the tournament, we need a good deal of

> pre-tournament information. That way, everyone scouting can focus on

> upgrading what we've already got & gathering new information.

>

> You can submit your information two ways: Email it to me, lacyjp at wfu.edu

> <mailto:lacyjp at wfu.edu>, or become a member of the wiki and add your

> information.

>

> Target deadline: Midnight, Tuesday, November 7. That will give us the

> time to post the information so it can be of use before the tournament.

>

> Expectations:

>

> Affirmative Disclosure--

>

> The most recent plan text(s) you've read.

> Complete 1ac outline(s) with full cites [Author, Source,

> Date, URL, page #s, First & Last phrases.]

> 2ac add-ons

> 2ac answers to common negative positions (including off

> case args & major case arguments)

>

> If your 1ac is not 'traditional', describe your

> affirmative in as much detail as necessary to provide the opposition the

> equivalent of the above. [Plus full cites for anything that can be cited

> -- like music or movie clips.]

>

> Negative Disclosure--

>

> Basic rule: Disclose the quantity & quality of

> information you'd want from a team when you are affirmative.

> Include at minimum the generic strategies you've

> deployed thus far, with a complete outline & full citations as described

> above.

> I say this every year: A good norm to stive for is MSU's

> Pre-Shirley disclosure from last year at www.wfu.edu/~lacyjp

> <http://www.wfu.edu/~lacyjp>

>

> We don't expect you to disclose new arguments. Keeping ‘caselist-able’

> electronic versions of new arguments is a great idea.

>

> A representative of Wake Debate has been assigned to each team entered

> in the tournament. They will be in contact with your opponents, your

> judges and maybe even you to gather as much pre-tournament information

> as possible. We appreciate all the help you can give us in that regard.

>

> Thanks!

> --JP Lacy

> lacyjp at wfu.edu

>

>

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

>

> _______________________________________________

> eDebate mailing list

> eDebate at ndtceda.com

> http://www.ndtceda.com/mailman/listinfo/edebate





More information about the eDebate mailing list