[eDebate] 1st Amendment/"That's too broad!"
J T
jtedebate at yahoo.com
Sun May 28 20:58:49 EDT 2006
First, we would NOT debate the full breadth of ANY area if the topic
was limited to previous decisions: SC should overturn one of
its decisions!
All of the massive ground some of you describe just
doesn't exist in the SC lit on decisions!...overturning
previous decisions is THE limiter for the topic! Of those
cases, some while overturn others...then some will just not
have good lit...which at least limits a bit...
Also, the direction of action can limit these areas: iincrease gov't protection of rights/decrease gov't authority, etc.
Galloway sent me a long list of previous cases on 1st Amendment
issues (thanks)...citing this as reasons why the topic is too broad...
while the above argumetns should answer this in part, he might
be right on using the whole 1st Amend. is too broad....
Galloway suggests using:
obscenity law
hate speech
seditious libel
One problem is the direction in which the decision (plan) would go...increase/decrease rights or gov't protections? It obviously cannot be just changed (bidirectional)...I think that's important in choosing an area or issues within a larger area.
Obscenity Law: This is not particularly a "hot topic". While there is definite case law, I think this as an area is definitely too limiting ...in terms of the actual issues presented it lacks diversity...
Hate Speech: Same again...while many cases exist, many overturn previous in the list...despite the number of cases, not many were contentious enough to generate much beyond simple links to generic args...
Seditious Libel: This would be a sweet discussion
The ALTERNATIVE:
limit "1st Amendment" to increase protections of "freedom of expression"...this is broad, yes, but no more than any other topic! Also the concerns at the top should mitigates those concerns. This option allows for aff flexibility, as well as predictable neg ground....ok, there is a diversity of issues, but the generic neg ground is still the same...PLUS it will hopefully diversify the kritikal literature base.....
so a res. would look something like this: That the USSC should overturn one or more of its previous decisions to substantially increase protection of 1st Amendment freedoms of expression in the United States.
here is a list of topics to be addressed within this resolution...DO NOT BE THROWN OFF BY THE LONG LIST! All of these issues are hyper-differentiated and most overlap within others in this list...This should make it clear...even in one area, the potential ISSUES within an area are hard to limit...but easy to overlimit...
Abortion Protests
Academic Freedom
Adult Businesses
Advocacy of Violence
Alien & Sedition Acts 1798
Aliens
Anonymous Expression
Antitrust
Attorney's Speech
Bar Admission Cases
Book Banning & Related Activities
Boycotts
Campaign Financing
Campaign Speech
Campus Speech Codes & Related Cases
Captive Audience
Charitable Solicitation Laws
Child Pornography
Children
Civil Rights (Race & Free Expression)
Commercial Speech
Communist Party
Compelled Speech/Association
Confidential Information (regulation of)
Contempt Orders
Content Neutrality
Contracts & Free Speech
Copyright
Corporate Speech
Criminal Libel
Cross Burning
Currency
Defamation
Demonstrations
Electronic Media
Emotional Distress (tort)
Espionage Act Cases
Espionage and Sedition Statutes (1917-1918)
Exceptions to First Amendment
False Light
Flag Desecration
Flag Salute
Free Press/Fair Trial
Free Speech Scholars
Freedom of Association, Assembly, Petition
Gag Orders
Government Employment
Government-Funded Expression
Group Membership (regulation of)
Handbills/Leaflets/Pamphlets
Hate Speech
Historical Materials
Hostile Audiences
Incidental Restrictions on Expression
Indecent Speech
Intentional Infliction of Mental Distress
Intermediate Scrutiny
Internet
Invasion of Privacy
James Madison
Jehovah's Witnesses
Labor Laws
Leafleting
Libraries
Licensing
Littering & Free Expression
Loyalty/Security
Mail (U.S.) Cases
Military
Movie Censorship
Newsracks
Noise Regulations
Nude Dancing
Obscenity
Offensive Words
Oral Arguments -- Audio Files
Overbreadth Doctrine
Parades
Pardons & Related Acts of Executive Clemency in Free Speech Cases
Parody
Patriotism & Free Speech
Picketing
Political/Electoral Process
Preferred Position
Press Cases (most famous)
Press Freedoms
Prior Restraints
Prisons
Private Individuals
Profanity
Public Figures
Public Forum/Private Property
Public Officials
Religious Speech
Reporter's Privilege
RICO cases
Search & Seizure
Secondary Effects Test
Securities Regulation
Sexual Material
Solicitors General Who Argued First Amendment Cases
Son of Sam Laws
Speaker Identity
Speech/Conduct Distinction
Standing
State Action
State Constitutional Provisions
Statutes (Espionage & Sedition Acts, 1917-1918)
Student Expression
Symbolic Speech & Expressive Conduct
Taxes on Expression
Telemarketing
Telephones
Tents & Symbolic Expression
Threats
Time, Place, and Manner Restrictions
Traffic Regulations
Truthful Information (restrictions on the reporting of)
Unconstitutional Conditions Doctrine
Unions & Freedom of Expression
Unsolicited Communications
Void for Vagueness Doctrine
War
Zoning
http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/
JT
Asst. Debate Coach
Emporia State University
---------------------------------
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messengers low PC-to-Phone call rates.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ndtceda.com/pipermail/edebate/attachments/20060528/7ccabe54/attachment.htm
More information about the eDebate
mailing list