[eDebate] ans Branson
Paul Strait
paulstrait at hotmail.com
Sat May 13 16:26:42 EDT 2006
This is interesting, but I'm not 100% convinced that no alt agent CP fiat =
intrinsicness. First of all, you don't even imply that it would elimiante
all non-intrinsic arguments, but rather just those that are a consequence of
actions taken by the same body that passes the plan, which usually is
Congress. But even in the case of Congress, the "Congress" as a whole
doesn't make monolothic decisions. Individual members vote particular ways
for a variety of different reasons. It seems completely reasonable to me to
think that if you were trying to convince Congress to enact X policy, some
people might decide that the political ramifiactions of doing so outweighed
the benefits. They might need, for example, to agree with colleagues to
vote for the India deal in order to get the requisite votes for policy X,
wich is something they are not willing to do. Or, in an even more clear cut
example, Bush might not want to support the plan because he doesn't want to
lose political capital with the Congress. In either case, a single decision
maker woudl be persuaded by the politics da. I am sure Korcok will make
this argument more clearly but I really don't think there is a link here.
LPS
More information about the eDebate
mailing list