[eDebate] Supreme Court Topic wording issues
Malcolm Gordon
malgorthewarrior at hotmail.com
Tue May 9 12:08:44 EDT 2006
JT-
thanks for the info, that will come in handy. I haven't done research on a
lot of the areas you mentioned (yet), but I do think the death penalty would
be a great issue. It was around on the treaties topic, for sure, but there
are many students who never had a chance to really debate it. And, as part
of an IR topic, most affirmatives centered around the affect the death
penalty has on foreign relations. To be sure, there are many who may take
the same route if it is run on this topic, but the potential for debating
the relationship between race, the state, and the death penalty seems to
intersect a lot of the major domestic impact areas warranted by a courts
topic.
Do you think that every case should be centered in one area. For instance,
if the topic was a list, would all of the cases have to do with the
environment, or would there be a case for each domestic issue? (IE a case
that focuses on race, one on gender issues, environment, native americans,
and so on)
PS-JT come to KC and catch a Royals game, tickets are at their lowest prices
EVER!!! :(
More information about the eDebate
mailing list