[eDebate] Geez - We have no method......

[Josh Hoe]

Dont think you suck,

You said those things....Am I wrong?  I quoted you directly....

Dont think I am great, just dont get why you have so much contempt for the
process and the people.

Josh


On 5/7/06, debate at ou.edu <debate at ou.edu> wrote:

>

>

> I new just would have to post sometime.

>

> Yeah Josh, I say everyone sucks.  I have destroyed all my processional

> relationships, while you still have your.

>

> Good job.  (Pat on the back)

>

> Josh is great yall!  Jackie sucks -- just in case you didnt get josh's

> message.

>

> Okay, now back to topic construction.

>

>

> From I suck

>

> ----- Original Message -----

> From: Josh Hoe <jbhdb8 at gmail.com>

> Date: Sunday, May 7, 2006 11:59 am

> Subject: Re: [eDebate] Geez - We have no method......

>

> > Hello,

> >

> > Two things were exposed by this email:

> >

> > 1.  People who support traditional topic construction are sheep

> >

> > "I think this explains how the cattle is herded, but what are the

> > pillars of

> > pedigogy utilized to create a topic wording."

> >

> > It sure is nice that Jackie is around to set us all straight about

> > what the

> > liberatory pedagogy is...Golly gee, and before I met Jack I looked

> > and acted

> > just like sheep...Thank goodness for the Jackie method....Thank God

> > he is

> > coming to save us all with his liberatory methods.  Jack brand

> > Topics "thank

> > goodness."

> >

> > 2. The topic committee and relationship to the larges community are

> > mostcharacterized by shadiness.

> >

> > "If you want to say nothing "shady" happens in this community

> > dealing with

> > rules, what the topic areas are and other issues, then you are

> > really just

> > kissing some a$$ right now."

> >

> > Yes, its true, even though he is leaving the community he just HAD

> > to smooch

> > some ass before he left.  You are so wise....Your backhanded "I am

> > surepeople really try" stuff is exposed for what it is nonsense.

> > You are on a

> > crusade and the topic committee will feel your crusading presence

> > soon.

> > Most important, you are right, I know when I was on the topic

> > committee we

> > got together in our secret community circumventing meeting prior to

> > the open

> > meeting....We planned out the arguments we would have before hand

> > so it

> > would appear we didnt have a real common agenda....We agreed on

> > which topic

> > we would write ahead of time and the other topics were just

> > smokescreens so

> > that we would never have a broad topic again.

> >

> > Most important, it is obvious that you have contempt for the people

> > and the

> > process.  Not sure why anyone should give you the consideration you

> > expectof them given your open superiority and contempt.

> >

> > Maybe that wasnt what you intended?  If not, your frustrations with

> > theprocess are igniting some reactions that maybe are a bit over

> > the line?

> >

> > I am looking forward to the "Post Topic Committee" Jackie report

> > which I

> > suspect will read like somewhat like the Weekly World News.

> >

> > Frankly, this isnt even about broad or limited topics....As you

> > know, I like

> > limited topics, but I am more than willing to go with a "Jackie"

> > topic once

> > as an experiment...I, for one, cant wait to see the miraculous

> > effects.

> > Josh

> > aka topic committee ass kisser

> >

>

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ndtceda.com/pipermail/edebate/attachments/20060507/7406ec42/attachment.html