[eDebate] Geez - We have no method......

[debate at ou.edu]

I new just would have to post sometime.

Yeah Josh, I say everyone sucks.  I have destroyed all my processional relationships, while you still have your.

Good job.  (Pat on the back)

Josh is great yall!  Jackie sucks -- just in case you didnt get josh's message.

Okay, now back to topic construction.



>From I suck


----- Original Message -----
From: Josh Hoe <jbhdb8 at gmail.com>
Date: Sunday, May 7, 2006 11:59 am
Subject: Re: [eDebate] Geez - We have no method......


> Hello,

> 

> Two things were exposed by this email:

> 

> 1.  People who support traditional topic construction are sheep

> 

> "I think this explains how the cattle is herded, but what are the 

> pillars of

> pedigogy utilized to create a topic wording."

> 

> It sure is nice that Jackie is around to set us all straight about 

> what the

> liberatory pedagogy is...Golly gee, and before I met Jack I looked 

> and acted

> just like sheep...Thank goodness for the Jackie method....Thank God 

> he is

> coming to save us all with his liberatory methods.  Jack brand 

> Topics "thank

> goodness."

> 

> 2. The topic committee and relationship to the larges community are 

> mostcharacterized by shadiness.

> 

> "If you want to say nothing "shady" happens in this community 

> dealing with

> rules, what the topic areas are and other issues, then you are 

> really just

> kissing some a$$ right now."

> 

> Yes, its true, even though he is leaving the community he just HAD 

> to smooch

> some ass before he left.  You are so wise....Your backhanded "I am 

> surepeople really try" stuff is exposed for what it is nonsense.  

> You are on a

> crusade and the topic committee will feel your crusading presence 

> soon.

> Most important, you are right, I know when I was on the topic 

> committee we

> got together in our secret community circumventing meeting prior to 

> the open

> meeting....We planned out the arguments we would have before hand 

> so it

> would appear we didnt have a real common agenda....We agreed on 

> which topic

> we would write ahead of time and the other topics were just 

> smokescreens so

> that we would never have a broad topic again.

> 

> Most important, it is obvious that you have contempt for the people 

> and the

> process.  Not sure why anyone should give you the consideration you 

> expectof them given your open superiority and contempt.

> 

> Maybe that wasnt what you intended?  If not, your frustrations with 

> theprocess are igniting some reactions that maybe are a bit over 

> the line?

> 

> I am looking forward to the "Post Topic Committee" Jackie report 

> which I

> suspect will read like somewhat like the Weekly World News.

> 

> Frankly, this isnt even about broad or limited topics....As you 

> know, I like

> limited topics, but I am more than willing to go with a "Jackie" 

> topic once

> as an experiment...I, for one, cant wait to see the miraculous 

> effects.

> Josh

> aka topic committee ass kisser

>