[eDebate] Geez - We have no method......

debate at ou.edu debate at ou.edu
Sun May 7 10:26:07 EDT 2006



I think this explains how the cattle is herded, but what are the pillars of pedigogy utilized to create a topic
wording.

I gave examples of important issues that should be discussed before solvency advocates are chased down
and filed together.

I do not doubt how the process you describes works, nor do I doubt that everyone works very hard towards a
common goal of creating a topic.

If you want to say nothing "shady" happens in this community dealing with rules, what the topic areas are and
other issues, then you are really just kissing some a$$ right now.

So your post was nice, nor do I doubt what you say, but there is step one and two and you explained steps 3
and 4. I dont doubt the role you played nor anyone who shows up.

Yes I am coming for sure, I have no doubts about this. Which was my position last year, that if you dont show
up, and dont have a tight network with someone there, then your SOL (which you agreed with).

See you in KC

Jackie



>

> Maybe this isn't it.. but I have this to say.

>

> I was at the topic committee meeting... seems to me pretty simple,

> they talk

> about ideas, we have framing discussions, had wording discussions,

> etc.

> Paul Mose and Joelle Japser were there too... and I got assigned

> one night

> to make sure the co-op topic, at least in the space cooperation

> section was

> worded correctly. If my freshman can get input... so can anyone.

>

> I think I was assigned to talk about exploration the next day... we

> had

> meetings, folks there got research assignments to check cases,

> etc... and

> solvency articles... and we crafted.

>

> There was nothing backchannel or shady about it Jackie, you just

> had to show

> up. In the case of JT you just had to be online to get IMs or

> emails from

> me about how you thought the wording should go.

>

> Even undergrads got assignments... people had opinions, but by and

> large the

> process was open and as far as crafting resolutions go.. I felt I

> got

> everything in I wanted to say. We got the co-op resolution we

> wanted people

> to look at and vote on.

>

> It didn't win, but I felt I crafted or helped craft a China

> resolution, so I

> can die happy now.

>

> NO ONE on the commitee pretended to be an expert, and Eric Suni was

> probably

> quickest on the box to get info. Hell even Ede was talking about

> solvency

> advocates, etc...ground. I found it one of the most DEMYSTIFYING

> processes

> I've ever seen. Everyone at home I communicated with got input.

>

> Yeah its hard to get to Kansas City, but if you want to shape the

> topic, its

> worth the trip. Hell I'm leaving for law school and I'm trying to

> get to

> the topic meeting just because the process itself was pretty damned

> cool and

> open.

>

> I love ya Jackie, but dude... go to KC and see it firsthand. It's

> not all

> that damned elitist, its pretty populist. Ross Smith makes good

> jokes too.

> Everyone gets input... but you know decisions are made.

>

> Ken D.

>

> _________________________________________________________________

> On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on

> how to

> get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement

>





More information about the eDebate mailing list