[eDebate] Geez - We have no method......
debate at ou.edu
debate at ou.edu
Sun May 7 10:26:07 EDT 2006
I think this explains how the cattle is herded, but what are the pillars of pedigogy utilized to create a topic
wording.
I gave examples of important issues that should be discussed before solvency advocates are chased down
and filed together.
I do not doubt how the process you describes works, nor do I doubt that everyone works very hard towards a
common goal of creating a topic.
If you want to say nothing "shady" happens in this community dealing with rules, what the topic areas are and
other issues, then you are really just kissing some a$$ right now.
So your post was nice, nor do I doubt what you say, but there is step one and two and you explained steps 3
and 4. I dont doubt the role you played nor anyone who shows up.
Yes I am coming for sure, I have no doubts about this. Which was my position last year, that if you dont show
up, and dont have a tight network with someone there, then your SOL (which you agreed with).
See you in KC
Jackie
>
> Maybe this isn't it.. but I have this to say.
>
> I was at the topic committee meeting... seems to me pretty simple,
> they talk
> about ideas, we have framing discussions, had wording discussions,
> etc.
> Paul Mose and Joelle Japser were there too... and I got assigned
> one night
> to make sure the co-op topic, at least in the space cooperation
> section was
> worded correctly. If my freshman can get input... so can anyone.
>
> I think I was assigned to talk about exploration the next day... we
> had
> meetings, folks there got research assignments to check cases,
> etc... and
> solvency articles... and we crafted.
>
> There was nothing backchannel or shady about it Jackie, you just
> had to show
> up. In the case of JT you just had to be online to get IMs or
> emails from
> me about how you thought the wording should go.
>
> Even undergrads got assignments... people had opinions, but by and
> large the
> process was open and as far as crafting resolutions go.. I felt I
> got
> everything in I wanted to say. We got the co-op resolution we
> wanted people
> to look at and vote on.
>
> It didn't win, but I felt I crafted or helped craft a China
> resolution, so I
> can die happy now.
>
> NO ONE on the commitee pretended to be an expert, and Eric Suni was
> probably
> quickest on the box to get info. Hell even Ede was talking about
> solvency
> advocates, etc...ground. I found it one of the most DEMYSTIFYING
> processes
> I've ever seen. Everyone at home I communicated with got input.
>
> Yeah its hard to get to Kansas City, but if you want to shape the
> topic, its
> worth the trip. Hell I'm leaving for law school and I'm trying to
> get to
> the topic meeting just because the process itself was pretty damned
> cool and
> open.
>
> I love ya Jackie, but dude... go to KC and see it firsthand. It's
> not all
> that damned elitist, its pretty populist. Ross Smith makes good
> jokes too.
> Everyone gets input... but you know decisions are made.
>
> Ken D.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on
> how to
> get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement
>
More information about the eDebate
mailing list