[eDebate] Topic Framing methods and vegatable throwers!

[Jean-Paul Lacy]

I admire simple things. (Example: My mind.) I like the elegance of that 
resolution.

But, is there any way to narrow that topic down? (Other than the 4 areas 
you mentioned?)

Maybe this is all a reason to work hard on developing a good presidential 
powers wording.

--JP



At 10:11 AM 5/4/2006, debate at ou.edu wrote:

>Yeah really

>

>number one could be modified such as

>

>Resolved: The USSC should reverse a past decision utilizing one of the 

>cases currently on the docket.

>

>keep it simple stupid is what i say

>

>----- Original Message -----

>From: Jean-Paul Lacy <lacyjp at wfu.edu>

>Date: Thursday, May 4, 2006 9:05 am

>Subject: Re: [eDebate] Topic Framing methods and vegatable throwers!

>

> >

> > >Resolved:  The United States Supreme Court should reverse its

> > decision

> > >based upon one of the cases

> > >currently on the docket.

> > >

> > >Resolved: The USFG should reverse a United States Supreme Court

> > decision

> > >in one of the following areas:

> > >Environment, civil liberties, copyright and seperation of powers.

> > >

> > >These are only examples, and did not involve an extensive amount

> > of thought,

> >

> >

> > Really....

> >