[eDebate] CEDA Nats

[Sue Peterson]

Hi Gary..
   
  I'm just wondering about the 4 round rule.  Is everyone REQUIRED to list themselves as available for 4 rounds, or do we list ourselves as available for the number of rounds to cover commitment and then the tournament has the perogative to force us to judge extra (up to four) for the benefit of mutual pref?  Just curious...
   
  Thanks,
   
  Sue

Gary Larson <Gary.N.Larson at wheaton.edu> wrote:
  I've been assured that the debateresults site has been reopened. I
apologize for any inconvenience. It is absolutely essential that
everyone double-checks their entry today to ensure that the information
is correct. If you have a wait-listed team, make sure that you confirm
that they are now an actual entry. Also check judging to ensure that
the round obligations are correct. At present, my math tells me that if
we have 219 teams (201 + 18 waitlisted) we would need a MINIMUM or 876
rounds of judging. At present we have 793 rounds on Bruschke's site, a
shortage of 83 rounds! Beyond that, the operation of the tournament
(undisclosed conflicts, missed rounds, etc.) requires additional rounds
beyond the minimum obligation. Please inform us if you can assist in
this way.

GARY

_______________________________________________
eDebate mailing list
eDebate at ndtceda.com
http://www.ndtceda.com/mailman/listinfo/edebate



Sue Peterson
Director of Forensics
Pepperdine University

"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." 
--John F. Kennedy




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ndtceda.com/pipermail/edebate/attachments/20060328/32a2348b/attachment.html