[eDebate] Topic Areas: Unofficial - (but witnessed) (fwd)

[Dallas Perkins]

You know, I was mostly joking.  JT did ask for a "description," not a
recapitulation, which is what I think he wanted.  Maybe you could
"seriously" offer one.  I admit my ignorance, and intended no insult to
the committee.

dp

On Sat, 3 Jun 2006 Spmancuso at aol.com wrote:


> Seriously, given the ignorant and insulting comments like Dallas's only an

> idiot would choose to donate the large amount of time necessary to serve on the

> topic committee.  Although I suppose at least some in our community would then

> have precisely the committee (and resolutions) they deserved.

>

> Dallas, I can assure you, the people on the committee, and those many others

> who chose to contribute their time and efforts by attending (including

> remotely) and helping - deserve much better than the back of your hand, with this

> flippant and ill-considered remark.

>

> Steve Mancuso

>

>

> In a message dated 6/3/06 4:12:24 PM, dperkins at fas.harvard.edu writes:

>

> << Sure.  In a word, "improvident."

>

>

> dp

>

>

> On Sat, 3 Jun 2006, J T wrote:

>

>

> > I may have missed it, but could someone describe the reasoning behind

> choosing to CURTAIL 1st amendment rights v. INCREASING PROTECTIONS...?

>

> >

>

> > >>

>