[eDebate] Topic Areas: Unofficial - (but witnessed)
Dallas Perkins
dperkins at fas.harvard.edu
Sat Jun 3 16:10:54 EDT 2006
Sure. In a word, "improvident."
dp
On Sat, 3 Jun 2006, J T wrote:
> I may have missed it, but could someone describe the reasoning behind choosing to CURTAIL 1st amendment rights v. INCREASING PROTECTIONS...?
>
>
>
> debate at ou.edu wrote: I am no official member of the topic committee, and these are from the meeting, rechecked with the blog.
>
> It is my understanding these are the topic choices on the ballot for the 2006-2007 topic choices.
>
> FYI - The specific cases will have the case numbers identified on the ballot!
>
> Area #1 �
>
> The United States Supreme Court should curtail the protection provided for free speech by the First Amendment of the United States� Constitution by overruling one or more of its decisions on obscenity, hate speech, and/or campaign finance.
>
> List # 1:
> The United States Supreme Court should overrule one or more of the following decisions
> � Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992)
> � Ex parte Quirin (1942)
> � U.S. v. Morrison (2000)
> � Milliken v. Bradley (1974)
> � Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)
> List #2:
> The United States Supreme Court should overrule one or more of the following decisions
> � Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992)
> � Ex parte Quirin (1942)
> � U.S. v. Morrison (2000)
> � Milliken v. Bradley (1974)
> � Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)
> � Terry v. Ohio (1968)
> � City of Boerne v. Flores (1997)
>
> List #3:
> The United States Supreme Court should overrule one or more of the following decisions
> � Ex parte Quirin (1942)
> � U.S. v. Morrison (2000)
> � Milliken v. Bradley (1974)
> � Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)
> � City of Boerne v. Flores (1997)
> � American Booksellers v. Hudnut (1986)
>
>
> List #4
> The United States Supreme Court should overrule one or more of the following decisions
> � Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992)
> � Ex parte Quirin (1942)
> � U.S. v. Morrison (2000)
> � Milliken v. Bradley (1974)
> � Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)
> � City of Boerne v. Flores (1997)
> � Terry v. Ohio (1968)
> � Gregg v. Georgia (1976)
>
> List #5
> The United States Supreme Court should overrule one or more of the following decisions
> � Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992)
> � U.S. v. Morrison (2000)
> � Milliken v. Bradley (1974)
> � Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)
> � City of Boerne v. Flores (1997)
> � Gregg v. Georgia (1976)
>
> List #6
> The United States Supreme Court should overrule one or more of the following decisions
> � Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992)
> � Ex parte Quirin (1942)
> � U.S. v. Morrison (2000)
> � Milliken v. Bradley (1974)
>
> List #7
> The United States Supreme Court should overrule one or more of the following decisions
> � Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992)
> � U.S. v. Morrison (2000)
> � Milliken v. Bradley (1974)
> � Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eDebate mailing list
> eDebate at ndtceda.com
> http://www.ndtceda.com/mailman/listinfo/edebate
>
>
> JT
>
> Asst. Debate Coach
> Emporia State University
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the eDebate
mailing list