[eDebate] CEDA Resolution 06-07--colon

[Kuswa, Kevin]

Great point, Hester.  As far as I can tell there are a number of textual "openings" at this point:
 
1. "Resolved:" ?
2. "decisions:" ?
3. "C, Q, Mo, Mi" with commas? does the word "or" or the phrase "and/or" appear before Milliken when you remove the bullet points?
 
Good work to the topic people--maybe a little more consultation would clarify what the text looks like at this point or we just go with what has been posted.
 
There is also a "form/at" issue with the first part of the topic being in a smaller font.  I don't think that matters, but it certainly might to some folks.
 
looking forward to it,
 
kevin

________________________________

From: Debate Team [mailto:dbteam at westga.edu]
Sent: Fri 7/21/2006 4:16 PM
To: Kuswa, Kevin
Cc: Jeffrey Jarman; Andy Ellis; edebate at ndtceda.com
Subject: Re: [eDebate] CEDA Resolution 06-07--colon



fwiw, i noticed (at least with the list i saw), that there's no "Resolved:"
prior to any of the topic choices.

given how much kirk evans invested in ground critical AFFs in this part of a
resolution, this could matter. it also seems to take away the T argument folks
often made againt "irony" AFFs, i.e., they weren't "resolved"...


hester


Quoting "Kuswa, Kevin" <kkuswa at richmond.edu>:


> Jeff, others--is there a colon ( : ) after "decisions" in the topic? 

> Is there a place where the text of the wording can be found without

> the bullet points?

>

> Thanks,

>

> kevin

>

> ________________________________

>

> From: edebate-bounces at ndtceda.com on behalf of Jeffrey Jarman

> Sent: Fri 7/21/2006 12:58 PM

> To: 'Andy Ellis'

> Cc: edebate at ndtceda.com

> Subject: Re: [eDebate] CEDA Resolution 06-07

>

>

>

> Sorry for the confusion.  The resolutions are available at

> www.cedatopic.com <http://www.cedatopic.com/> .

>

> I pasted the following from that site:

>

>

>

> The United States Supreme Court should overrule one or more of the

> following decisions

>

> *     Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992)

> *     Ex parte Quirin, 317 U.S. 1 (1942)

> *     U.S. v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 (2000)

> *     Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717 (1974)

>

>

>

> Jeff

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Andy Ellis [mailto:andy.edebate at gmail.com]

> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 11:32 AM

> To: Jeffrey Jarman

> Cc: edebate at ndtceda.com

> Subject: Re: [eDebate] CEDA Resolution 06-07

>

>

>

> um can you post it or do we get to say we uphold the following

>

> "four cases no gratz"

>

>

>

>

> On 7/21/06, Jeffrey Jarman < jeffrey.jarman at wichita.edu

> <mailto:jeffrey.jarman at wichita.edu> > wrote:

>

> -->

>

> The winning topic is Four Cases, No Gratz.

>

>

>

> 82 ballots were cast.

>

> The final vote was 43 - 35.  The vote results are below.

>

>

>

> The amendment to split the East region into two passed 51-16.

>

>

>

>

>

> The first round of balloting had the following totals (first place votes):

>

>

>

> First A:  17

>

> Five:  6

>

> Seven:  4

>

> Six No Casey:  10

>

> Eight:  10

>

> Six No Quirin/Terry:  10

>

> Four No Gratz:  12

>

> Four No Quirin:  13

>

>

>

> The second round of ballot had the following totals:

>

>

>

> First A:  17

>

> Five:  6

>

> Six No Casey:  11

>

> Eight:  11

>

> Six No Quirin/Terry:  11

>

> Four No Gratz:  13

>

> Four No Quirin:  13

>

>

>

> The third round of balloting had the following totals:

>

>

>

> First A:  19

>

> Six No Casey:  12

>

> Eight:  11

>

> Six No Quirin/Terry:  11

>

> Four No Gratz:  15

>

> Four No Quirin:  14

>

>

>

> The fourth round of balloting had the following totals:

>

>

>

> First A:  22

>

> Six No Casey:  25

>

> Four No Gratz:  19

>

> Four No Quirin:  16

>

>

>

> The fifth round of balloting had the following totals:

>

>

>

> First A:  22

>

> Six No Casey:  27

>

> Four No Gratz:  33

>

>

>

> The sixth round of balloting had the following totals:

>

>

>

> Six No Casey:  35

>

> Four No Gratz:  43

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> eDebate mailing list

> eDebate at ndtceda.com

> http://www.ndtceda.com/mailman/listinfo/edebate

>

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> eDebate mailing list

> eDebate at ndtceda.com

> http://www.ndtceda.com/mailman/listinfo/edebate

>