[eDebate] ???Overturning Roe v Wade????

[nrichter at umsis.miami.edu]

It seems quite telling that you respond to real concerns about this community, 
particularily to two womyn by calling them "childish."  Enough said. 


Quoting Paul Strait <paulstrait at hotmail.com>:


> Bracket off the fact that no one has attempted at all to answer the arg

> made 

> by Rubino and Hester that if Aff's have to overturn Roe v. Wade, it

> doesn't 

> also mean they have to advocate a pro-life position.

> 

> Also, bracket off the argument made by many that this is an extremely 

> salient political issue and it is telling that people are afraid to

> debate 

> both sides of it.  (And the idea that Roe v. Wade is equivalent to Brown

> v. 

> Board of Education of Topeka is one of the offensive thing I have heard

> on 

> edebate since Matt Schiros was around, and a total slap in the face to 

> pro-life feminists as well as people of color).

> 

> The way that this complaint has been made just seems childish to me.  It

> 

> almost sounds like people would be willing to hijack debate if they

> don't 

> get their way.  "if the topic that I don't want wins, I just won't

> debate" 

> or "if the topic that I don't want wins, as a judge I will always vote 

> Aff/neg."  Grow up.

> 

> 

> _______________________________________________

> eDebate mailing list

> eDebate at ndtceda.com

> http://www.ndtceda.com/mailman/listinfo/edebate

>