[eDebate] ???Overturning Roe v Wade????

[Joseph Carver]

On 4/10/06, nrichter at umsis.miami.edu <nrichter at umsis.miami.edu> wrote:

>

> . I believe you that your opinion may not have been

> devalued at these meetings, but I don't think you have made an argument

> about

> why that is equally true for womyn.



I think that the onus is on you to describe why the participation is
structured in a way to forecloses meaningful female participation. Afterall,
the topic process has multiple avenues for participation. If not in a group
setting that makes the sphere uncomfortable, why not in the writing process?
This argument is a non starter. Perhaps someone who has attended the topic
meetings or written a paper would like to step up and explain what part of
the dynamic made them feel excluded?

Joe




>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ndtceda.com/pipermail/edebate/attachments/20060410/846b57fc/attachment.htm